There is a hard-core group of skeptics
out there who insist that the Burzynski treatment is a scam. They
have never had cancer. They have never been to the Burzynski clinic,
nor have they ever received treatment there. They do not know one
single person who has been a patient at that clinic, and they have no
evidence of any former patient being dissatisfied with the treatment
received at the Burzynski clinic. But, they have their beliefs.
Fine. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. The problem is
they are taking excerpts from patient's blogs about their struggles
with cancer, twisting them, and presenting them as damning facts
in an attempt to prove that Dr. Burzynski is a charlatan. The most shocking are the
judgmental statements about parents who chose the antineoplaston
treatment for their son or daughter, and watched their dear child
lose their battle despite the treatment. I was angry about the way
they used Adam's story, but I cried for the parents who lost their
children to brain cancer, and the callous way someone could showcase
their story on a website, only to ridicule their decision.
Let me say this about the Burzynski
Clinic. Keep in mind I have been there. I was there for 5 weeks. I
met Dr. Burzynski several times, and met nearly everyone that works
in his clinic. His treatment works. It does not work for everyone,
but it does work for some. He doesn't claim a 100% cure rate. But,
I know people who have been
cured by his treatment. On our journey, Adam and I have met a lot of
people with brain cancer. Most of those people we met through the
clinic. And some of them are cancer-free today. And it is due
solely to the Burzynski treatment.
One
last point about the patients of the Burzynski Clinic. The skeptics
would have you believe that everyone that walks through the doors of
Dr. Burzynski's building is clueless, ignorant, and has been unfairly
taken advantage of. The patients I met were the most educated
people I have ever met regarding modern medicine and cancer
treatment. And I mean all
cancer treatments, including the conventional methods. They have
spent thousands upon thousands of hours reading about chemotherapy,
radiation, all the cancer drugs available, what is available in
clinical trials, and every alternative approach ever attempted to
defeat cancer. They know it all. They know the statistics and have
read all the studies. They often know more about cancer than many
oncologists. They understand how and why it develops, and they
understand how it can be controlled. I am proud to be a part of this
club. And we all found our way to the same place.
All
that said, I now want to share something I discovered today. Often
in alternative circles, one statistic regarding chemotherapy gets
thrown around a lot. The 2% thing. A study was conducted in
Australia regarding survival rates of cancer, and the conclusion was
that chemo only improved survival rates by an average of 2%. That
doesn't mean that only 2% of cancer patients receiving chemo survive
past the 5 year mark. But, some people have wrongly interpreted it
that way. What it really means is that if everyone that has ever
been told they have cancer, be it Stage 1 prostate cancer or Stage 4
lung cancer, has an average “survival” rate of 60%, then chemo
will increase that percentage by 2%. The term “survival” or
“cure” refers to the 5 year mark in the cancer world. If you
live 5 years after your diagnosis, you are considered cured. If you
die one week later, you still maintain your place on the cure list.
Now, if you have a 60% chance of making it to 5 years, then this
study proved that chemotherapy will increase your chance by 2%. So,
after chemo, you will have a 62% chance of survival. It's different
from the idea that only 2% of chemo patients “make it”, but it
isn't exactly a glowing report either. And it depends entirely on
the type of cancer. According to other studies, cancer patients with
high grade astrocytomas have a 3% survival rate. According to the
Australia study, brain cancer patients who receive chemotherapy
increase their survival rate by 3.7%. Now you might say that doubles
their chances, and you would be right. Having a 6.7% chance of
living for 5 more years does sound better than a 3% chance, but then
you have to consider the side effects of chemo and the quality of
life you could expect afterwards. The quality of life issue is a
major deciding factor for Adam, and that is why he feels so strongly
against trying any sort of chemotherapy. For others, it may not be a
factor, and therefore choosing to try chemo makes sense. That's the
thing about cancer. Every single patient is on their own journey.
Every single patient has to decide what is right for them. Many
people have complete faith in the medical system, adore their doctor,
and will do whatever they are advised to do. They aren't crazy about
researching, or maybe they just aren't very good at it. Or maybe
they have read the studies and countless books about cancer, and have
reached the conclusion that for their cancer, for their stage in
life, and for their particular situation that modern medicine is the
only way to go. I would never criticize or judge anyone for the
choices they made regarding their cancer treatment. REGARDLESS of
how it turned out. Adam and I have spent a full year learning
everything we possibly can about cancer. We have dedicated ourselves
to researching different aspects of cancer development and treatment,
and have combined our knowledge and decided together (with God's
confirming signs) how to proceed. We have absolutely no regrets.
And I sincerely hope that no one else on this incredibly difficult
journey has regrets either. We are all doing the best we can, and we
all have the same hope and dream. And that is just to live as many
more days as possible.
There are no contact details on your profile or I would have emailed you directly. I would be happy to answer any questions you have.
ReplyDeleteDo not respond to this person, it is a scammer.
ReplyDelete